stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). I tested nine brands of 82 eyepieces, all in the 13 mm to 16 mm range, a focal length that provides moderate power on most telescopes and so is suitable for all types of viewing. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. Old thread, but thought I would ask here first just in case instead of starting something new Stellarvue is running a sale on a 3 piece set of their 82 degree eyepieces for $292 while ES 82's are on sale for $99 each. One thing I like about the type 6 Naglers for doubles is that they're parfocal. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). Performance is excellent, with stars sharp across all but the outer 10 percent of the field. I'll have to change this in the upcoming 2017 Buyer's Guide. Bottom Line: A good, economical choice for Schmidt-Cassegrains. Its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the bigger ASIAir Plus astrophoto computer, but is it as good? They're just too big and heavy and more of a novelty view for me, whereas my 82's are quite comfortable. I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. These are $65 or so.., Observing in Northern/Southern Michigan, USA, The NEAF Report from nPAE Precision Astro Engineering. Read Alan Dyers comparison of nine 82-degree eyepieces, Tag List TELESCOPE meade eyepiece Explore Scientific tele vue omegon stellarvue. Cons: Short eye relief and non-adjustable eyecup. There are many really good ones available in this category, all across the price spectrum. All in all, exactly what you'd expect from Stellarvue: A great product at a reasonable price. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . But what matters is who you buy it from, the specifications, customer service, reliability, and price (of course), when making your actual purchasing decision. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/. Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle 15mm MSRP $150 Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. Has anyone out there tried both or have any thoughts? Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights. of Students: approx. The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. I find that I can use nearly the entire field of an 82 eyepiece for observing an object but the wider field of a 100 or 110 eyepiece does not add much to the field useful for observing the planets and double stars. Note the Meades middle-weight 638 gram mass and that both the Meade and Omegon are just for 2-inch focusers, requiring more costly 2-inch filters. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. I think they are made by the same company that made other brands, Orion, Zhumell, SmartAstronomy, et al. Cons: Heavy and 2-inch only; shorter eye relief. This is a superb eyepiece for the money, with the bonus of argon-filled waterproof construction to keep moisture from penetrating and fogging the eyepiece on humid nights. Teasing me? They look very much alike the new TS UWANs, but with a special Stellarvue twist reminiscent of their 100 line. I didn't understand how big a deal this was until I bit the bullet and purchased a chair. Thanks. While the 76 Baader Morpheus provides slightly less field of view than the rest, the long eye relief and excellent image quality makes it new favorite of mine, and worthy of consideration. Probably not by much, if at all. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. I have the Stellarvue 15mm UWA and it needs some focal length to clean up the field as curvature starts getting beyond tolerable for my eye around the 65-70% mark in an f/7 600mm refractor. I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. Bottom Line: The standard of performance for 100 eyepieces. Each of the eight elements are fully multi-coated, edge blackened and the lens barrel and baffles are similarly dark black. In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. I think you will find a wide range of preferences. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. The only cons I've noticed is that they are big and heavy and change the balance point for my small scope+cheap mount and like any other optical system they have to cool down to ambient temp to get the best view (which takes a few minutes). Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series.This ultra wide field eyepiece has almost 3 times the area of a 50 degree eyepiece. While not as wide as the others, the Morpheus comes close, so I included it. Good decision! Haven't noticed these before. sold for a while and that line was 16, 8, 4. At 580 grams, it is the heaviest of the 82 set. I was surprised! You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. Report back witn with your thoughts when you get a chance. Edited by 25585, 06 March 2023 - 09:04 AM. this IS the best value in an ocular that I have found.., I'm super pleased with the product. Though more costly, the Stellarvue Optimus also stood out for price vs. performance in a full 100 eyepiece. Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. To be totally fair, not all eyeglass wearers are the same or require the same amount of eye relief. Bottom Line: Near-Ethos image quality for less money. For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Not quite so easy a question. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. But just as outsourcing is more desirable at times, as it is with his ED doublets or now discontinued Russian optics, it would be inane to attempt to make eyepieces when United Optical can make them as good as he can for much less cost. I find that the longer the focal length of the scope, the more I wanted wider apparent fields. But it is an excellent and attractive, though large, eyepiece at a slightly lower price than a Nagler with much better eye relief. Pros: Great optics; wider field; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. Pros: Great optics; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. I started with the A-T and would still have it if my wife did not wear glasses (I'm guessing it's only a matter of time for me as well). At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvues Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. It's the same at low power, which Ernest just pointed out. I think these are the same that WO(?) The Meade and Omegon represent great values. Back in my youth I worked for a company that "made" computer monitors and the OEM was required to make it to our specs, but others were not. It's a great eyepiece. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Vixens fine eyepieces dont get the respect they deserve. Bottom Line: Very good optics and mechanics for an excellent price. At least I think they are new because I can't find anything about these focal lengths, they currently have 4, 8, and 15mm available. I love my 20mm 100 degree eyepiece. The 9mm Optimus was tack-sharp across the 100 FOV. I've been thinking about getting the 15mm as my first non-cheapo eyepiece so I'm looking forward to hearing what you think about it. Good luck and clear skies! I had the pleasure of looking through all of the Optimus eyepieces with Vic at the DSSP. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. See William Paolinis review of all six Morpheus eyepieces here, and his full review of the Morpheus 17.5mm eyepiece here. (Yeah, yeah, I know that's asking a lot.). Eye relief is 15mm, a little longer than the Explore and Stellarvue competitors. *Measured with eye cup rolled down. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) I just ordered two 1.25" 32 mm 52 degree GSO eyepieces from Agena Astro because I would like to have that wider TFOV. You are right, he has a complete optical and CNC machine shop at his facility. That makes swapping eyepieces at high magnifications easier. Nuff said! 51,000 students. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. This grade conversion formula, together with your degree programs Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), is a tool to help your convert grades earned in countries other than Germany. This my first refractor, my first telescope with quality optics, my first telescope with a wide field of view, and my first telescope with a decent focuser (among other firsts) so I am very excited and anxious to get my hands on it. Stars begin to distort in the outer 25 percent of the field, so worse than the Explore Scientific and Tele Vue Ethos, but still very good, especially for the price. The A-T is darn close, but does give more magnification and FOV. But the original Ethos remains unmatched for optics. It sounds like at $65 a piece it would be hard to do any better. It performs well on faster telescopes, a key characteristic of Nagler and Ethos eyepieces. The 100 eyepiece tripod. Omegon in Germany offers many unique products such as their Panorama2 eyepieces. I saw clear, sharp, spacious views of Jupiter and the Moon when I first tried this eyepiece, and it also works well on double stars. ***Apparent Field of View measured in degrees. Orion sold them as did WO too. display: none !important; Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. In eyepieces, models with the extreme apparent field of 100 rank at the top for performance - but also price! Now I see all 3 at half price sale for under $300 for them and that's pretty good, imo! The failure rate, resolution, sharpness, and other subtle differences were there. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. The LHD series includes four other focal lengths, all with 20mm eye relief, and with the 4mm, 6mm and 9mm eyepieces having 1.25-inch barrels but very tall form factors. We have the same scope, so I can give you a few pointers to consider. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. No. An important factor is whether you have astigmatism in your observing eye and need to wear glasses when observing,. Night Sky Challenges and the Astronomical League. Add 1/8" if rolled up. Your grading system is A+, A, B, C, D and E (Fail). Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New. Mega gratz on your new scope NIckwin. A year ago, they had 3 focal lengths of 82 eyepieces of 4, 7, and 16mm, and I reported them in the 2016 Guide to eyepieces. They are still the best but are expensive. Unfortunately EP focal lengths are rarely exactly accurate and in the case of the axioms they were obviously paying homage to the original 23mm axiom and 24mm was close enough to call a 23. At NEAF, I purchased the 16mm UWA from Stellarvue for $95. Eye relief is a very long 20mm. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! Pros: Very good optics and waterproof construction. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. (1) it seems that for observer favorite FOV is defined by nature of human eye: 120-140 deg. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. For some reason, uncle Al seems to have a monopoly on 13-16mm compact 82s that perform well in fast scopes as the 16 UWAN was the weak link in that line as well, but I don't remember ever trying the 16, or scrutinizing the 15mm axiom LX vs the 14 Meade or ES. I tested this set on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. Tele Vues Type 6 Naglers are small, light and tack sharp across the field, even on fast f-ratio telescopes. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). Anything is possible. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. I have the WO versions of these and find them very good, indeed! Posted by Steve Lightstone on 8th Aug 2020. Get a chair! . I really like the 82 FoV in my scope, great image, easy to manage and store. Meades new PWA (Premium Wide Angle) series is effectively a new version of their previous 82 UWA series, which is still available as of November 2020.

Autorama 2022 Schedule, Ferrari Of Palm Beach Staff, All Charges, Payments, And Adjustments Are Recorded On The, Hetch Hetchy Controversy Apush, Old Cars For Sale In Arizona By Owner, Articles S