slatestarcodex autism

Anyway, if the data were there, I would suggest an alternate explanation that a significant portion of gender dysphoria is socially mediated, and the autistic are isolated from the social phenomenon. Broadly, intelligence might be, say: pattern recognition, ability to readjust priors, visual imagination, factual recall, procedural memory etc. Her IQ has only been tested once, by a neuropsych, and came in around 90. Level measurements also seem consistent with possible causes being differences in responsiveness to oxytocin rather than differences in normal concentration. Probably wrong ideas generated from your writing here: We know that core elements of cognition not only do develop early in life, but *have* to develop in life. Brasserie Cambier - Croix, Hauts-de-France - Untappd I have a day job and SSC gets free hosting, so don't feel pressured to contribute. https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/05/07/5-httlpr-a-pointed-review/ Of the 5 relatives, how many are males? Autism And Intelligence: Much More Than You Wanted To Know This is more or less a requirement if the system is to be robust and quickly adaptable to environmental variation. After further consideration, Im unaware of any phenomenon which would correspond to a low-function, low-intelligence version. Plus the military is always interested in easy ways to enforce security and they arent too bothered by political correctness, so any automated defense units that I might hypothetically build could also be a profitable side-business for me. Their career progress might have stalled due to stress and sleep deprivation. Its hard to pin down why this is the case, but I think it is related to the things above, but also to the fact that gifted people tend to be bad at copying other people instinctively. People with average or above average intelligence and autism are much, much less likely to be diagnosed, because one contributing cause of a diagnosis is seeing a psychiatrist, which is much more likely for people who are having trouble in classes. autism is effectively what we call people whose mental resolution (in the sense of pixels per inch) is too high. Its a highly abnormal subset of people. Take any part away, and you lose some intellectual ability. Humans have been selectively breeding themselves since the dawn of civilization, even if we werent consciously aware of it; reproductively speaking, the traits that are selected for in an organized society are bound to differ than those that wouldve been selected for in the wild. Another, potentially related, possibility is that we are disproportionately likely to diagnose white kids with autism rather than other forms of mental disability. If smart people are predisposed to have autistic kids (which Scott seems very confident of), another trait of smart people is that they tend to get more education than average. Compare to this study https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e029040.full based on the scottish census data. That said, I too doubt the extreme male brain hypothesis in a general sense, although it may be true in a more limited sense (where autism consists of more masculine features for certain parts of the brain, but not all of them). Im very open to people arguing the contrary, but I must say, in 8 years of doing abstract mathematics, I never met an Asperger-like person where giftedness did not seem to be part of the equation. If you keep stacking up genes that in isolation would improve your running speed, but that involve trade-offs or may have adverse interactions with each other by both modifying the same chemical pathway or something Eventually you have too many and things collapse. And how come its so inconsistent, and many people have naturally high intelligence but arent autistic at all? The military is where the fun toys are all at! . Now imagine that someone was in that condition but *couldnt* turn it off. Could you elaborate? This study of three large birth cohorts finds a correlation between genetic risk for autism and cognitive ability (beta = 0.07). Not just running an emulation of normal to deal with other people? Maybe even only a small fraction of potential arrangements are just right to produce ever-increasing levels of some capability in the phenotype. My oldest child, a boy, is very high functioning. Even if the definition is good, people who function poorly are more likely to seek out (or be coerced into) psychiatric treatment, and so are more likely to be identified. Blacks have an infant mortality rate more than twice as high as whites do. Intelligence and social aptitude dont seem to be positively correlated, at least not very strongly, but theyre definitely not negatively correlated. Its a small sample (156) and its 10-14 year olds, not adults. No ICU or anything that severe, but still something that differentiates her from the other children. Under the DSM-5, autism is characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction across multiple contexts, as well as restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. The hypothesis of the blog post is that two people with autism spectrum traits should have children with associated negative outcomes. One big category would be selection bias due to diagnosis bias. at 25/26 and Ph.D. at 29/30, so might not be of the caliber of your acquaintance, though. Crespi suggests that autism is marked by an imbalance between P (as the tower) and V + R (as the foundation). Take these away and you arrive at something that seems like an effortless confidence and freedom. 46.8k members in the slatestarcodex community. i.e. As a result, we could have similar imbalances. The difference between high and low functioning autistic children is significant. I also have more ability to perceive what processes I am running. Many such cases with Aspergers (me too), whereas for high functioning autism the deficit is inverted for processing vs visuo-spatial. (2) Genes associated with autism arent being selected for What will be interesting to see if we get weeded out before getting close to the top, and if the breakdown will stay the same. I would hypothesize based on this that autistic people usually have parents who are very good at exactly those areas that they have trouble in. We dont have an understanding of how autism exists in the general populace so our data is skewed towards the worst because of where that data comes from. My stats-fu isnt strong enough to know if this actually pencils out, though. However, history doesnt always predict the future. Its because we selectively bred dogs to have these traits at a much faster rate than evolution could naturally develop them. We were grouped with autistic including low functioning autistics. She pointed out that there are a couple widely-used kinds of IQ test. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet. (For example, a too-big head would kill mother and baby until modern times; now it just means mom gets a C-section.). One just needs to consider a model where a brain is a complicated object whose organization and function depends on changes in the genetic blueprint in non-monotonic ways, and it is likely that all combinations (attainable via sexual reproduction) of genes that are beneficial alone or in some particular arrangements are not even more beneficial together; some of the potential arrangements are bound to be non-optimal or even catastrophic. This shows a) there isnt much of a childhood autism epidemic going on, its more likely that previous underdiagnosis occurred. AISafety.com hosts a Skype reading group Wednesdays at 19:45 UTC, reading new and old articles on different aspects of AI Safety. Kylounet is drinking a CAMBIER Double Galaxy by Brasserie Cambier at Terroir Alternatif. For another (Ravens), its a bunch of iterations of the same basic task (a kind of visual puzzle with one piece missing), described here. Naive, narcissistic, completely detached from human interaction. Id say his IQ is similar to or higher than mine (around 135.). the non-verbal. Im pretty sure that at some point the emulation efficiency hits diminishing returns- that its not emulations all the way up, in other words. To some extent, incompatible advantages can stack by affecting entirely different things (one runner with salutary mutations affecting his legs, his lungs, and his adrenal gland) But to some extent they cant. The Effective Altruism newsletter provides monthly updates on the highest-impact ways to do good and help others. There is also some link to male sex, I do believe that there are higher levels of males with low intelligence autism. If autism is a result of piling up too many high-IQ alleles, then youd expect to see far more of it in the children of scientists, lawyers, engineers, doctors, mathematicians, etc., than in the children of janitors, file clerks, policemen, nurses, etc. Trump = President Camacho, the contemporary media is just as idiotic as the media in that movie, etc. Thus, the question under discussion becomes does every highly intelligent person have some of these autism-linked genes, or are there other paths to high intelligence that do not involve these genes?. most kids will be pretty clearly high or low functioning, with little in between? It could be that geniuses are less visible with more obscure achievements because they work behind-the-scenes at institutions, whether universities or corporations. The selection findings are across historical time, not recent industrial time, and theyve found that IQ is being selected for as well. n=1, but it was striking to watch my very smart middle kid go from being a near-outcast in his good Catholic school to a guy with lots of friends at his magnet school. Theres a new paper out on how the frequency of variants that affect educational achievement (which also affect IQ) have been changing over time in Iceland. There are a lot more pathways to leveraging raw intelligence to acquire economic status now than there used to be, but very few that get you all the way to the point that youre fully safe from the tribe (since the tribe is now the nation and is thus also much stronger now). This gene developed in Africa, and can be seen as a fundamental reason for the transatlantic slave trade. For example: people who are smart are more likely to seek out a diagnosis for their kid who has something wrong with them. If I suggest autism is effectively what we call people whose mental resolution (in the sense of pixels per inch) is too high, would that make sense to you? My office mate is a big sports fan who cares a lot about his yard and house and is a fairly partisan Democratand whos also a mathematician who plays folk music and speaks several languages. But >39 repeats means risk of the disease. Id guess the funny people can be funny even when their jokes bomb, because they can make their failed jokes into a joke at their own expense? We're always hiring talented programmers, traders, and researchers and have internships and fulltime positions in New York, London, and Hong Kong. So, part of people's problem is with the origins of ABA. They may also have eccentric opinions or interests but theyre more likely to pursue them obsessively or compulsively without good reason, and they have trouble with self-awareness and awareness of others. Given the problems measuring IQ in autistic people (spiky profiles, huge differences between ravens vs. weschler) its also possible that intellectual disabilities are overreported at 15%. I havent been keeping up.) I think its possible that some relatively simple model will be found to explain this relationship, but I also think its possible that the mechanics of intelligence are simply complex enough that the explanation is something inaccessible with our current level of understanding. But many do it for positive outcomes versus negative pressure, which is how I interpreted your question. Having charismatic superpowers isnt normal, and I suspect requires being sufficiently unconcerned with opinion sufficiently thing-oriented so as to cease to be normal. She is a university qualified computer systems engineer. Every autism case is caused by some combination of these three factors, and the more it is caused by normal genes, the more intelligence is likely to be preserved (~100% confidence), 4. I still sometimes feel bad about whether that ended up slightly ruining some sort of investigation into which methods of teaching spelling were better or something like that. (my son was a Caesarian delivery) but that was because his head (=brain?) This reminds me of something a past friend mentioned. I am convinced there are a lot more genius now, but : Commentary: The autistic community is having a reckoning with ABA Other times, the conversations would seem weird as hell in most placesdiscussions of physics or evolution or game theory or genetics or whatever, with a high background level of assumed knowledge. Graph B is the same thing, but with people have have autism with intellectual disability. Ive met a couple AMAB people identifying as genderqueer, but at least an order of magnitude more AFAB ones. Physically, people with autism might have certain brain structures or modes of neural connection that are associated with high intelligence, but without the surrounding neurological infrastructure necessary to support those structures/functions like the poor Great Dane whose heart is too small and bones are too weak for his frame. Over the vast majority of the range of the main volume knob on the mixer (assuming the system is set up reasonably), more will be better. What's the difference between autism and attachment disorder? -.-). Figuring out the causes of neurotypicality in intelligent people would go a long way, but its hard even to measure how neurotypical a given smart person is. Other interesting question if the Flynn effect is more important than genetics and our mean IQ is 15 points higher than 100 years ago: where are all the geniuses? For such individuals, perfect pitch is almost always the indicator that highly refined processing is available in these areas of immediate reception of sound. If missing, intelligence develops a lot less/later/incompletely? 80,000 Hours researches different problems and professions to help you figure out how to do as much good as possible. One just needs to consider a model where a brain is a complicated object whose organization and function depends on changes in the genetic blueprint in non-monotonic ways, and it is likely that all combinations (attainable via sexual reproduction) of genes that are beneficial alone or in some particular arrangements are not even more beneficial together; some of the potential arrangements are bound to be non-optimal or even catastrophic. And yes, I know the survey showed that the average SSC reader had an IQ of 138, but Im extremely skeptical of that finding too. You mentioned height, which I think is a good example too we have studies (possibly not good ones) showing that taller people have better outcomes, get treated nicer, are more attractive but people who get too tall have bad medical problems, shorter life expectancy. Genes are not something where you can say, this is good, more of it will be better. I am not, but we both initially bonded over (I dont know a way to put this delicately or more exactly) being objectively very smart people that dont perform intelligence very well, albeit different ways. The best civil servants get an extra allowance of weirdness points to allocate as necessary. Observing matters in my local school, I think that child psychiatry is best understood as a means of managing problems that arise in childrens socialization to the school environment, and clusters of diagnoses align with a big three of socialization difficulties: weird dont fit in kids are diagnosed as autistic, restless cant sit still or stop acting up kids are diagnosed as ADD, violent/fighting/tantrum kids are diagnosed with oppositional disorders. Intelligence is clearly not a neat and predictable thing, at least beyond certain broad generalizations or thresholds. During a conversation on something or other he told my friend that he knew what my friend was going to say, then ended up saying thats not what Id thought youd say afterward. At least part of the story is that there are at least three different causes of autism. I have always considered him more naturally gifted than me. Book Review: The Perfect Health Diet I hesitate to make anything out of this, but whenever theres a study that links pre-natal stress to autism, my ears perk up a little. A PhD in particle physics at 15 is incredibly impressive, but a programmer starting out of college at an FAANG who saves a bit will be a millionaire by 30. In the graph of relatives, are autists typically on the border or inside of high-IQ regions? Right, genes are NOT good or bad. Epistemic status: not too bad, certainly good enough to have my old head of department, a grand old neurogeneticist interested in this if still maintaining healthy scientific skepticism. We often joke that my son learned English as a second language, it appeared that his primary language acquisition pathway just wasnt there. Most of my coworkers (except for the youngest ones) are married, and many have children. Why on Earth one would assume that the effect of genes that contribute to IQ should be linearly additive and increasing to ad infinitum? I am simply saying that when you encounter lots of GS11+ people they are exactly like Comey. On that and other evidence, its pretty clear the above article isnt talking about autistics like me. the genetic load would be due to bad luck in parent mixing (recessive-recessive pairs) and parent age. The relatives of autistic people will usually have many of the genes for autism, but not be autistic themselves. Arizone State University Autism symptoms reduced nearly 50% two years after fecal transplant (Note that if autism is really one thing [not a complex syndrome], with high and normal functioning individuals, and high vs normal correlates with IQ, then if you only measure the normal autistics, youd get results like the above, due to sampling bias. If it is, that could explain some of these results. I suspect that this is the case. Moments of it? could equally be applied to people who arent especially intelligent. Precision of it? For purposes of a discussion of this, I think its best if we restrict ourselves to unusual behaviors. In Graph A, we see that if a child has autism (but not intellectual disability), their likelihood of having a father with any particular IQ (orange line) is almost the same as the likelihood of a neurotypical child having a father of that IQ (dotted line). With more aggressive screening for such things, we would see a much smaller diagnosis gap. And then theres Jacob Collier, who can detect, and accurately sing, the difference between an A at 440Hz and at 432Hz, and that allows him to do stuff like this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPZn4x3uOac) where he sings a 10-part harmonisation of In the Bleak Midwinter in which hes gradually shifting the key-centre upwards throughout, and then for the last verse he performs a 4-chord pivot to a key halfway between G and G# on the scale hes in at the time, by taking advantage of slight mis-definition in the equal-tempered approximations to those pivot chords that allows him to quickly shift to an entirely out-of-tune system (if you switched directly, it would just sound like trash) in just four chords without it sounding odd. Question the second. This study of 45,000 Danes finds that genetic risk for autism correlates at about 0.2 with both IQ and educational attainment. Slate Star Codex Suggestion - The Autism Neurodiversity Debate List of Probability Calibration Exercises - LessWrong Four things that make one delicious combination. Obviously it cannot be 100%, but I have not yet encountered one that isnt a narcissist or what the internet calls an autist. Autistic people have weird developmental trajectories. His auditory channel is very slow and only turns on when you say his name or repeat the question. Autism, rationality and intelligence. ), but the non-additive portion is of roughly comparable size. But by intelligence mean the ability of a complex system (a brain) to operate effectively; so being smart is much more similar to being able to run really fast or having a good immune system.. Low-functioning autism has all kinds of genetic linkages to all kinds of different genetic syndromes that cause brain damage, damage that often extends beyond autistic symptoms. I spent a lot of time reading about giftedness (having a IQ > 130) in the last few months, specifically educating gifted kids and teenagers, and I found out quite some things about how giftedness can interact with social ability: It turns out that giftedness can be quite a burden for children and teenagers, as not many of their peers can relate to them and vice versa. You underestimate the potential of a good emulation, I think. I have read before that age of parents increases risk of autism. ASD has no reliable early predictor, no unitary developmental course, no unitary life outcome, no unitary recurrence risk, no unitary pattern of BAP features, and no standard homogeneous subgroups. If the IQ/autism risk genes are being selected for, we should be seeing more top-level geniuses each generation (Im very skeptical of this) and more autistic children (this half checks out). My 3rd child, a girl, is much lower functioning. Today, he weighs about 195. Given the numerous different genetic correlates to autism, if one wants to preserve the diagnostic validity of autism by finding a single etiology, one might hypothesize that all of these genes affect a narrow set of brain circuitry in a similar way, but as discussed in the Waterhouse paper people have tried to do this and (per her lit review) failed to do so. no IQb + low genetic load : high intelligence, sociable, not so technically inclined I have a possible explanation for the observed distribution of intelligence in autistic people. I married an autistic woman. She was born with the cord around her neck, and we had respiratory specialists on hand to assist. But it adds the concept of a "safe starch" - where the classic paleo diet has a zero tolerance policy toward carbohydrates, the Perfect Health Diet allows certain carbs like rice, potatoes, and lots of weird things like "taro" and "sago". Why on Earth one would assume that the effect of genes that contribute to IQ should be linearly additive and increasing to ad infinitum. I dont think this paragraph fits the note in the image. IQ dropping over recent decades in many developed countries, combined with lower TFR for high-IQ isnt evidence? They propose that the reason evolution favors autism genes is that they generally increase intelligence. If the g factor and IQ gains from the Flynn Effect are negatively correlated, then does that mean that IQ tests are gradually being more and more poorly designed over time? We dont let people who are neither smart nor charismatic hang out with us, and people who are both smart and charismatic dont want to hang out with us. (Apologies for a machine metaphor that is certainly misleading, but better than anything else than I can think of.). Slate Star Codex - Wikipedia Low IQ people are more likely to end up dead or in jail, and are less likely to be in stable nuclear families. The specific way the model plays out may be through perceptual intelligence out of balance with verbal and rotational intelligence causing autism (3% confidence), (The post is awesome, heres a few errata, feel free to delete this after reading.) Ethics and effectiveness of ABA Therapy for Autism Our 2nd, 4th, and 5th children are not autistic, so parent age doesnt seem to have played a role in our case (though we were both relatively young even for our fifth, at 36 and 35.).

Croydon Council Housing Bidding, Amber Johnston Siblings, Adventhealth Orlando Lockdown, Articles S